[ad_1]
A graduate scholar in philosophy wrote to share that he and one other scholar had been lately booted from an edited assortment underneath contract with Cambridge College Press (CUP) as a result of the press doesn’t enable chapters to be authored solely by graduate college students.
The coverage was apparently unknown to the quantity’s editor, who had included the scholars among the many contributing authors within the e-book’s proposal. In keeping with the scholar who wrote me, the editor conveyed the information to him after listening to from CUP in regards to the rule, which was justified on industrial grounds—that together with chapters authored solely by graduate college students could deter some potential consumers.
I reached out to an editor at CUP to find out whether or not in truth this was a coverage on the press, however have but to listen to again. If it’s a coverage, it must be comparatively new, as some trying into the matter revealed that the writer has up to now launched collections which comprise some chapters authored solely by graduate college students.
A blanket ban on graduate college students looks like a mistake on editorial grounds, as typically graduate college students could also be the very best ready to put in writing on particular matters. And whereas I’m no advertising knowledgeable, the industrial justification for it appears to be a stretch; I’d be shocked if anybody liable for this coverage offered information that advised that, say, an edited assortment with a chapter or two written by graduate college students will promote lower than one with none graduate college students.
Do another presses have such a coverage?
Dialogue welcome.
[ad_2]
