In 1968, The Inhabitants Bomb by the Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich grew to become a bestseller. With its foreboding thesis that humanity’s inhabitants development was outpacing its capacity to feed itself, it was a uncommon guide that each caught the eye of the general public and have become deeply influential in tutorial circles. However not everybody was a fan. One of many guide’s largest critics was the economist Julian Simon, then a professor on the College of Illinois. Simon thought the thesis of The Inhabitants Bomb was little greater than poorly drawn speculative fiction, calling Ehrlich a ‘false prophet’. Human ingenuity, Simon argued, would in the end accommodate the exploding inhabitants. As this quick animation from TED-Ed particulars, the continuing skilled feud between the 2 distinguished lecturers in the end culminated in a $1,000 guess on the destiny of humanity – one which Ehrlich would in the end pay out, and that shifted the best way the world understood inhabitants development.