I didn’t suppose this occurred anymore, however apparently some philosophy journals nonetheless reject or decline to think about manuscripts as a result of they don’t conform to the journal’s or writer’s type necessities.
We’re not speaking about size limits or spacing, however issues like using contractions, quotation strategies, spelling, formatting of sections, and so forth, as mentioned in this publish from a number of years in the past. There’s no purpose to not maintain off imposing conformity with these necessities on a bit till after it’s accepted, and loads of purpose to not insist that authors, given the state of affairs with philosophy publishing, repeatedly make these superficial-yet-time-consuming alterations every time they submit their manuscript to a brand new journal. Additional, if a journal’s coverage is that preliminary submissions needn’t conform to their home type, that needs to be express within the journal’s directions for authors. As I wrote within the earlier publish:
Many people, we’ll admit, already interact within the observe of ignoring type pointers on preliminary submissions. However that may be a luxurious afforded largely to these for whom the timeliness of an article’s acceptance might not be that essential, e.g., these with safe, tenured employment. Those that want a publication quickly—for the job market or for tenure, say—are much less more likely to take this threat. It will be good for them to know whether or not they’re losing their time.
As I mentioned, I assumed the observe of rejecting or declining to think about manuscripts based mostly on lack of conformity to deal with type had bit the mud, however a philosophy professor informs me that some journals nonetheless insist on it. She requested that such journals be named right here as a solution to encourage them to change their insurance policies, and talked about the next as journals that had lately returned manuscripts of individuals she is aware of for not assembly formatting and elegance necessities: Philosophia, Journal of Ethics, Moral Principle and Ethical Apply, and The Pluralist. The editors of those journals are welcome to tell us if that’s certainly their coverage, to elucidate why it’s nonetheless in place, or to tell us that it has modified. Readers are requested to share which journals have rejected or declined to think about their submissions due to lack of conformity to deal with type. (Additionally, please be aware that this joke has already been made.)