Cite your sources and provides them credit score–it’s simpler mentioned than achieved.
On one hand, it’s simple to come across philosophy papers that fail to quote sufficient sources. It’s simpler to quote the same old suspects that others already cite than to train impartial judgment about who deserves to be cited. In my expertise, philosophers’ citations go disproportionately to authors, ideally male, who work in “high” departments, publish in “high” venues, or are already cited by different “star” philosophers, or to authors who’ve achieved “star” standing. It will be nice if all of us did our half to right that bias at the least slightly bit.
However, there are manner too many publications for anybody to aim to analysis every part that might be related to at least one’s work, and even a big proportion of related sources, to find out whether or not they need to be cited. In case you attempt to cite each supply that might be related to your paper, not to mention e-book, you’ll hardly get achieved.
As is commonly the case, we should always attempt for an affordable center floor. Do your analysis, use your personal judgment, and make it some extent to quote at the least some individuals who did precious work regardless that they don’t seem to be extremely seen within the occupation (but).
Quotation equity is particularly necessary for individuals who write evaluate articles, comparable to SEP entry. I not too long ago witnessed an episode the place a revised SEP entry omitted a extremely related paper. When the omission was identified to the SEP writer, they responded that they deliberately omitted that supply as a result of it was not but “influential or extensively cited”. I understand that it’s inconceivable so that you can assess this example with out understanding the specifics of the case. Suffice it to say that, in my very own judgment, this SEP writer did the alternative of what they need to have achieved. They’re the professional: regardless that they will’t cite each related supply as a result of there are simply too many, it’s their job to quote precious new work in order that others know to quote it sooner or later. That’s what I attempt to do in my very own SEP entry (co-authored with Corey Maley).